h1

Non-Discipline Day

January 13, 2007

Almost every book ever written about behaviour management will include this piece of advice: “Be consistent”. Now in practice there are some members of SMT who will give the opposite advice (“be flexible”,) but it is generally accepted that consistency is a key part of managing behaviour. Kids should know the rules and that the rules should always apply.
There is, unfortunately, a commonly made exception. Common sense will always retreat in front of tradition and many schools have developed the tradition of having a day where – for charity – some of the school rules, namely the ones related to school uniform, are suspended. On these Non-Discipline Days (more often known as “Non-Uniform Days”) teachers are no longer able to object to the gang colours, short skirts, expensive trainers, sexually explicit t-shirts and identity concealing head gear that a teenager is forced to wear by their peers when not protected by adults. And who could possibly object? It’s for charity.
Well I could object for the following reasons.

  1. Rules are not something that can be switched on and off. It makes no more sense to have a day when the uniform rules are relaxed than it would be to have a day where students are encouraged to skip lessons, break windows or burn down the canteen.
  2. School uniforms are one of the most important weapons against truancy. Simply put, if a parent makes sure their teenage child is in uniform and locked out of the house there is a more than reasonable chance they will end up in school eventually. Take the uniforms out of the equation and they are far more likely to race to the nearest amusement arcade, shopping mall or crack house. At Woodrow Wilson School SMT brought an end to the recurring cycle of Non-Discipline Days when it was noted that it reduced attendance in years 10 and 11 by over ten percent.
  3. Discipline is worse on these days. Children believe they won’t have to work as it is a special occasion. Caps and hoodies provide greater anonymity for truants and trouble makers. At my current school (which has a little bit of an internal truancy problem) I actually caught 14 different children out of lessons in a single afternoon on Non-Discipline day. (Well I say caught, a more accurate observation would be that in most cases I observed them pulling their hoods over their heads and running off.) And this is without mentioning the two girls in Year 9 who don’t do a thing all day because they have decided to do a sponsored silence to raise £1.63 in sponsorship money between them.
  4. You have to constantly explain which rules are still in place and which aren’t:“No, you can’t dye your hair in the toilets”; “You can’t wear hats indoors”; “Balaclavas and gimp masks are not acceptable”; “Yes, you still have to bring in a pen to write with”.
  5. Compassion inflation sets in. If the school could abandon the rules for Children In Need then they should do it for Comic Relief, and Jeans for Genes Day, and any emergency in the news, and for the local dogs home, and to fund the school’s awards day. It doesn’t take long before it’s one day a month and there’s still resentment from any teacher with a new good cause if they don’t get a day too.
  6. It’s a pain to collect the money in.

Of course part of the problem is that with schools failing to carry out their core function of educating children in an orderly environment then there is an abnormally strong desire to get them to carry out secondary functions, such as charitable fundraising, community work or school productions. All these things would be highly desirable if schools were doing the basics right, but seem utterly unnecessary when there is anarchy in the classrooms not being dealt with. I sometimes fear that if given a choice between achieving a 100% literacy rate among students and appearing in the local paper handing over a cheque for £137.50 to a donkey sanctuary, most headteachers would choose the latter. Nobody wants to be seen as uncharitable. Running a rubbish school is however entirely socially acceptable.

About these ads

5 comments

  1. On the flip side of the coin, I note you mention school productions as an ‘add on’ or a kind of ‘icing on the cake frippery’.
    IMO and my experience, it is exactly the reverse.
    A child who is in the school play may actively and permanently be a reformed case and suddenly see the point of school.
    Back in the day, when the school production was given time off timetable and the whole school were involved in lessons that were linked to it eg icebergs and global warming for ‘Titanic’,geography – where did it actually sink? History,etc; in IT and Art the posters,set, programmes and ticket sales,Food tech the refreshments; every child actively part of the production.

    The whole school saw the end result of the team effort and yes- it even made money!
    What a glorious way of teaching commitment to an enterprise,responsibility to the team ( learn your lines, attend rehearsals, be there in the audience!)discover the sense of achievement hard work can bring.
    Time and again ex students tell me the best thing they ever did at school was the school play.

    *sob*
    Rant over.
    I was the Mock Turtle in Alice.
    Readers: were you ever in the school play?
    Can you ever forget it?


  2. You forgot the other reason not ot have these days. Office staff and TA’s dressed as ‘sexy’ schoolgirls.

    Truly vomit-inducing.


  3. Despite having zero acting, singing or dancing ability, I was in loads of them because you were let off PE and RE for rehearsals.

    Food Tech should not have been providing refreshments unless the premises and personnel had been checked by the EHO.


  4. Our school has a non-uniform day once every half term, we have spoken to the pupils and they know that it is a privilege, any misbehaviour means that we can withdraw the right for them to wear non-uniform eg hoodies are still banned in the building as are i-pods and mobiles, form-reps (pupils) collect in the money and it has to be in before the actual day otherwise it doesn’t go ahead. If we find that there is an increase in the number of incidents, truancy etc then it won’t happen next time… and it does actually work. I think it works because of the high level of pupil-teacher interaction and discussion/debate.. it doesn’t have to be a bad thing to let them have non-uniform…



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,324 other followers

%d bloggers like this: